Your Privacy

This site uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and deliver personalized content. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.
COOKIE POLICY

Skip to main content

How Often Should You Replace Existing Technology?

How Often Should You Replace Existing Technology?
Back to insights

When to replace existing technology? It is a question that often gets avoided or ignored, leading to an overwhelming amount of tech that no longer gives your business the competitive advantage it needs. In today’s world, change is happening faster than ever. To adapt to changing conditions, you need to continuously evaluate when to update or replace the tech that enabled your initial advantage over your competition. 

What I have observed at medium to Fortune 500 size companies is that when they identify an opportunity where technology can give them an advantage, they typically go through an evaluation process of various technology solutions. This evaluation typically covers functionality, cost, timelines on implementation, and return on investment. Additionally, the company should evaluate the impact this will have over a specific period. 

Too often, I have seen the last part skipped over. This leads to future weakness in the company and, thus, opportunities for their competitors to capture some of their market share by not replacing technology. This loss in market share is because they did not re-evaluate that solution years later. Instead, they implemented a solution and got business value from it and assumed it was always going to continue giving them the same value. 

The business became dependent on that technology and as conditions changed, they may have made modifications and updates to the technology but never did a complete re-evaluation to see if this was the right technological solution for the next few years. Consistently modifying and updating solutions can cause technology that was an advantage, to now becoming a disadvantage or anchor, slowing down your innovation and adaptation. 

My recommendation is to set a specific timeline for every major technology solution that you put in place where you will come back and complete a new strategic assessment and evaluation to determine if it is something that you need to replace or modify. 

Most critical technology solutions take over a year to implement, and some take many years. To retain your competitive advantage, you must have a new or updated solution ready prior to the current solution becoming obsolete.  

Connect with us if you want to learn how UDig can help you evaluate your current solutions and build a technology roadmap for your software or data solutions.

Looking for a Software Rewrite Strategy? If you have decided you are ready to embark on the journey of rewriting your software, dig into this blog.

Digging In

  • Software Engineering

    When There’s Too Much to Fix: How Smart Prioritization Unlocks Revenue at Scale

    Every operations team has a backlog. The question isn’t whether you can clear it — it’s whether you’re clearing it in the right order. For most teams, the honest answer is no. And that gap between the order work gets done, and the order it should get done is quietly costing organizations millions. The Volume Problem High-volume exception processing shows up across […]

  • Software Engineering

    Creating Reusable Code Templates to Reduce Client Project Startup Time

    In consulting, one of the least visible but most expensive phases of a project is the beginning. Teams can spend days or weeks setting up repositories, agreeing on structure, wiring basic infrastructure, and solving problems that have already been solved many times before. Code templates are a practical way to reduce overhead while improving consistency. […]

  • Software Engineering

    Player Three Has Entered the Game: How AI Is Finally Bridging the Divide Between Design and Engineering

    As AI begins to become more prominent in our day-to-day lives, I find myself in a unique position. As a practicing software engineer and UI/UX designer, I am genuinely happy to see the introduction of AI tools begin to take shape in our industry. But more importantly, I am happy to start seeing the effects it is having on what has historically been a pretty challenging relationship: the […]

  • Software Engineering

    The Disappearing Middle of Software Work: Why the Bookends – Strategy & Impact – Matter Most Now

    Here’s a question nobody in enterprise software wants to sit with: what happens to the middle? Not the middle of the org chart. The middle of the work. The vast, expensive layer of effort that has defined enterprise software delivery for thirty years—translating what the business wants into working code. The requirements-to-implementation pipeline. The “build phase.” […]

  • Software Engineering

    Zero-Code Telemetry with OpenTelemetry’s OBI

    Full distributed tracing and exception capture for any application — without writing a single line of instrumentation code. View the source code on GitHub → The Premise Observability is essential for understanding what’s happening inside your services, but instrumenting an application by hand — adding trace spans, logging calls, and metric counters throughout your codebase […]

  • Software Engineering

    Building a Consultant in the Trenches: How Playing Offensive Line Shaped My Consulting Career

    People often ask me the same question when they find out that I played college football: “Do you miss it?” On the surface, it’s a bad question with an obvious answer. Yes. However, if I give myself a minute to sit with that question, the answer is more nuanced. Yes, I miss playing football, but […]